<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two-leg squats vs. Modified Single-leg squats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billhartman.net/blog/2010/02/14/two-leg-squats-vs-modified-single-leg-squats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billhartman.net/blog/2010/02/14/two-leg-squats-vs-modified-single-leg-squats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:49:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t miss these great links!</title>
		<link>http://billhartman.net/blog/2010/02/14/two-leg-squats-vs-modified-single-leg-squats/comment-page-1/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t miss these great links!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billhartman.net/blog/?p=288#comment-825</guid>
		<description>[...] doesn’t write often but when he does it is wise to pay attention.  In this short article, he comments on a study performed on female athletes showing that the rear-foot-elevated-split-squat showed greater demands [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] doesn’t write often but when he does it is wise to pay attention.  In this short article, he comments on a study performed on female athletes showing that the rear-foot-elevated-split-squat showed greater demands [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://billhartman.net/blog/2010/02/14/two-leg-squats-vs-modified-single-leg-squats/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billhartman.net/blog/?p=288#comment-803</guid>
		<description>It really depends on the athlete&#039;s needs, however, I would consider single leg exercises to be supplementary in most cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really depends on the athlete&#8217;s needs, however, I would consider single leg exercises to be supplementary in most cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ross</title>
		<link>http://billhartman.net/blog/2010/02/14/two-leg-squats-vs-modified-single-leg-squats/comment-page-1/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billhartman.net/blog/?p=288#comment-802</guid>
		<description>Bill,  Would you think that in Off season GSP work that doing more single leg work ( not exluding TLS) would be of benefit for the athletes and gradually shift the volume from MSLS to TLS as the season and competition progresses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,  Would you think that in Off season GSP work that doing more single leg work ( not exluding TLS) would be of benefit for the athletes and gradually shift the volume from MSLS to TLS as the season and competition progresses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Deganti</title>
		<link>http://billhartman.net/blog/2010/02/14/two-leg-squats-vs-modified-single-leg-squats/comment-page-1/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>James Deganti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 04:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billhartman.net/blog/?p=288#comment-801</guid>
		<description>Bill,

The best policy would seem to be to blend the use of uni and bilateral work , but to always be mindful of not trying to fit a square peg in a round hole or force the usage of movements that may exacerbate pre-existing issues, as you mentioned in cases like back squatting those with low back issues or overhead pressing with those who have shoulder issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>The best policy would seem to be to blend the use of uni and bilateral work , but to always be mindful of not trying to fit a square peg in a round hole or force the usage of movements that may exacerbate pre-existing issues, as you mentioned in cases like back squatting those with low back issues or overhead pressing with those who have shoulder issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
