<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoracic Mobility is a Myth?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billhartman.net/blog/2010/02/04/thoracic-mobility-is-myth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billhartman.net/blog/2010/02/04/thoracic-mobility-is-myth/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:49:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://billhartman.net/blog/2010/02/04/thoracic-mobility-is-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billhartman.net/blog/?p=252#comment-785</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll tend to do at least a little of both with most clients as maintenance since most have similar postural demands.  Otherwise, it&#039;ll depend on where the greatest limitations show up.  The inferior angle of the scapula is typically about T7, so with greater restrictions at T7 or above, you may find you need more rotation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll tend to do at least a little of both with most clients as maintenance since most have similar postural demands.  Otherwise, it&#8217;ll depend on where the greatest limitations show up.  The inferior angle of the scapula is typically about T7, so with greater restrictions at T7 or above, you may find you need more rotation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rees</title>
		<link>http://billhartman.net/blog/2010/02/04/thoracic-mobility-is-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Rees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billhartman.net/blog/?p=252#comment-784</guid>
		<description>Very concise. Well done sir. Wish I would&#039;ve written it. 

How much extension based mobility drills vs. rotational drills do you work into your programs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very concise. Well done sir. Wish I would&#8217;ve written it. </p>
<p>How much extension based mobility drills vs. rotational drills do you work into your programs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Theisen</title>
		<link>http://billhartman.net/blog/2010/02/04/thoracic-mobility-is-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Theisen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billhartman.net/blog/?p=252#comment-783</guid>
		<description>Mr. Hartman, 

Thank you for your response! I will indeed investigate more literature on spinal mobility. To clarify, I was strictly asking about rotational mobility of the T-vertebrae. But your answer addressed the issue. If I remember right we were actually looking at golfers whose movements had been measured and captured digitally. Most of the golfers studied had poor posture, and that was when I raised the question about T-spine mobility training as a corrective tool. 

Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Hartman, </p>
<p>Thank you for your response! I will indeed investigate more literature on spinal mobility. To clarify, I was strictly asking about rotational mobility of the T-vertebrae. But your answer addressed the issue. If I remember right we were actually looking at golfers whose movements had been measured and captured digitally. Most of the golfers studied had poor posture, and that was when I raised the question about T-spine mobility training as a corrective tool. </p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuff You Should Read: 2/8/10 &#124; EricCressey.com</title>
		<link>http://billhartman.net/blog/2010/02/04/thoracic-mobility-is-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuff You Should Read: 2/8/10 &#124; EricCressey.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billhartman.net/blog/?p=252#comment-781</guid>
		<description>[...] Thoracic Mobility is a Myth? - Bill Hartman answers a reader&#8217;s question on thoracic spine mobility in great detail.  It&#8217;s definitely worth a read. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thoracic Mobility is a Myth? &#8211; Bill Hartman answers a reader&#8217;s question on thoracic spine mobility in great detail.  It&#8217;s definitely worth a read. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Sanders</title>
		<link>http://billhartman.net/blog/2010/02/04/thoracic-mobility-is-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billhartman.net/blog/?p=252#comment-777</guid>
		<description>Maybe you should&#039;ve suggested that the class all pitch in and buy the professor a copy of that book...I believe it&#039;s called &quot;Clinical Anatomy of the Spine&quot;?

But, I digress...we discussed it many times during my visits this summer...too many professors are out of touch with the practical side of things.  They know how to set up research experiments, they know how to conduct research, and they know how to interpret it as it pertains to adding to the body of science and amongst their peers.  But, in terms of looking at and truly understanding the real world application, they are clueless.  Or, in terms of branching out beyond their narrow scope of research, they are very limited.

That&#039;s precisely why a professor/researcher like Dr. McGill is so far ahead of the game and very much on the forefront.  He combines his research with practical experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should&#8217;ve suggested that the class all pitch in and buy the professor a copy of that book&#8230;I believe it&#8217;s called &#8220;Clinical Anatomy of the Spine&#8221;?</p>
<p>But, I digress&#8230;we discussed it many times during my visits this summer&#8230;too many professors are out of touch with the practical side of things.  They know how to set up research experiments, they know how to conduct research, and they know how to interpret it as it pertains to adding to the body of science and amongst their peers.  But, in terms of looking at and truly understanding the real world application, they are clueless.  Or, in terms of branching out beyond their narrow scope of research, they are very limited.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s precisely why a professor/researcher like Dr. McGill is so far ahead of the game and very much on the forefront.  He combines his research with practical experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
